City of Coral Gables

File #: 21-2215    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Minutes Status: Noted and Filed
File created: 3/16/2021 In control: City Commission
On agenda: 3/23/2021 Final action: 3/23/2021
Enactment date: Enactment #:
Title: Insurance and Risk Management Advisory Board Meeting of March 5, 2021.
Attachments: 1. Cover Ltr Min Meeting 03 05 21, 2. City Clk Atten Sheet - IBA ADV Board 03 05 21, 3. 3.5.21 Minute with Exhibits
Title
Insurance and Risk Management Advisory Board Meeting of March 5, 2021.
Body
[Replace with BRIEF HISTORY/SUMMARY]
Board member Mr. Juan C. Diaz-Padron opened the meeting. Meeting was called to order at 9:03am. Quorum in person was not reached.

OLD BUSINESS:
Update Insurance Renewal Process - Ms. Maria Perez- Arthur J. Gallagher
In depth discussions in a period of over three hours were conducted.

A. Presentation by Arthur J. Gallagher (“AJG”) of the renewal of the current insurance program
-Maria Perez presented AJG’s Executive Summary (Exhibit 1) and went over the City’s current insurance program and the status of the insurance renewal.
-Maria also presented the difference in premiums between FMIT’s proposal and the proposal if the City continued with its current program structure, which is approximately $800,000.

The renewal numbers that were presented were the current worst case scenario in terms of premiums, of importance to note :

The Package Program renewal with the same insurance carrier BRIT, increased by15% to $829,500 (for a total of $1,007,006 when you include excess workers‘ compensation) due to claim history and a hardening market. A quote also was received from Safety for $891,884 (include excess workers’ compensation) and PESLIC for$910,100 (includes excess workers’ compensation). FMIT quoted $822,112 but advised that this was contingent on the City also obtaining property coverage with them.

The Excess Workers Compensation renewal saw a rate increase of 7% with the incumbent carrier.

The Property Insurance renewal was a premium rate increase of 4.84% despite a hardening market where some clients saw an increase of over 20%. The City informed the Board that it was in the process of having most of its properties re-indexed and those properties that were not being re-indexed were being physically appraised. The property value of the majority of the City’s properties that were reindexed increased by13%. JC Padron asked whether th...

Click here for full text